OK -- isn't it time to convince Dick Cheney to shut his obscene mouth?

The war criminals keep saying "It's only torture if the subject's life is in danger."

And, oh, yeah, only a couple were waterboarded --

But the unredacted 2004 CIA Inspector General's Report is coming out

It's all been one big giant fucking distraction campaign -- the report is out -- Americans tortured AND KILLED through torture more than 100 prisoners

And of course Dick Cheney knew it, right? He's always swaggering around talking about how HE read reports the rest of us haven't.

Hoist on his own mother-fucking petard.

So it's time -- have AG Holder do the investigation as is required by Treaty and then either turn him over to the World Court for Crimes Against Humanity

Or have one of our wonderful "rogue" agents visit him some night to show him EXACTLY what is meant by the word "torture," and shut him up.

Good Lord -- that inhuman vicious sneer in and of itself is a crime against humanity.

Michael Jackson -- dear media masters -- give us a F#&%ing break!

The MSM (Mainstream Media) News, so called, can't help themselves -- they didn't report on the incredible historic Global Warming Bill passed by the House of Reps yesterday, nor the insanity in Iran -- they were too fixated on the death of Michael Jackson.

The closest they came to NEWS was to report on the emails from people who said "ENOUGH!"

They pick apart the pieces, but can't see it was a total package -- his talent, his drive, his perfectionism, his self-destructive dysmorphia, his addiction to surgery, his hatred of his family, of his own image in the mirror, his pathological infantilization -- all inseperable parts of the same dynamic -- or syndrome, if you will.

In other words, it all came from the same place of desperate need that forced him to Peter Pan himself.

When one has enough money, indulging one's pathologies is almost a given.

And no -- I, who am willing to believe the worst about most of the people who force themselves into the public's face, I do NOT believe he ever molested a child. But, still being a child in his mind, I have no doubt a lot of innocent play took place, including skinny-dipping and grab-ass and general nudity -- kids at play.

I think that what went on at Neverland was more or less some of the same thing that went on every summer at Bohemian Grove in California among the financial and political power-players of the world. People who blow off steam (and some say, each other) running around naked, screaming, laughing, manic, crazed -- and unlike Neverland -- also drunk and stoned and playing vicious pecking-order dominance games.

Yeah, I know -- the people who serve food and drink and clean up the messes made by the big boys at play are sworn to never talk about what goes one there, but they do.

Watching the interminable retrospective of Michael Jackson's life is like watching The Picture of Dorian Grey, but from the other side. In this re-telling, there was a portrait of a handsome young man up in the attic and what we saw in public was a hideously disintegrating face, intent on the the progress of his own self-destruction. Realizing that makes seeing the old photos and re-hearing his old songs almost as depressing as a memorial trip through Dachau.

Ed McMahon and Farah Fawcett -- wow -- the people who pass themselves off as journalists were like puppies, rolling on the ground and peeing all over themselves in delight.

We've all heard their creed:

"If it bleeds, it leads... If it dies, it flies."

And then -- wow -- Michael Jackson kakks -- and to the slavering press, his frail dead body was the whipped cream and the cherry on top of the carnage ... Oboy, eh?

To quote another icon* of contemporary music, Bob Dylan:

"OK, I've had enough -- what else can you show me?"**

-------------------------------

*And can we also accept the fact that the words ICON and ICONIC have been used, overused, and done to death? Especially, in the meaning of an image to be worshipped, thinking of Michael Jackson's face as THAT image is right up there with opening the front door and standing there, the young man who is dating your daughter is Freddy Kruger.
------

**From It's alright Ma

----
AND --

Ted Kane tells me Sky Saxon died on Thursday -- he was a good showman (The Seeds, The Sky Saxon Blues Band) but not a world-famous freakshow, so not much to cover.

Sky Saxon (Richard Marsh) -- Dead at age 63 on June 25, 2009 in Austin Texas.

Iran, Lenny Bruce, and The Palladium

As the Great Grand Ayatollah and the Miniscule Meany Ahmadinejad continue to blow it royally,* I keep thinking of a bit Lenny Bruce** did in the 50's called The Palladium, in which a lounge comic, what used to be called a "tits and ass" comic, has the bizarrely inappropriate idea that what he needs to advance his career is to play "a class room" -- The Palladium -- an English Music Hall.

Over his agent's objections, he gets a booking, and comes on stage following a tribute to "All the boys who went to Dunkirk and never came back" that has everyone in the audience sobbing in grief.

He bombs.

And he keeps trying and trying and trying, getting fully into "flop sweat," in which the performer tries harder and harder to get to the audience but only succeeds in making it worse.

In the bit, he finally triggers an anti-Irish riot and needs to be smuggled out of the place wearing the wig of an old-time drag act.

That seems to me, in all its horror, to be exactly what those bearded bozos are doing, and if it weren't so criminally hideous, it would be funny -- dark grim humor admittedly, but still...

Every day they make it worse -- every day the protesters gain more and more supporters around the world.

And every day the Ayatollah and the Mini-tollah have less and less control, and every day they can feel their power slipping away a little more, which terrifies them and makes them double down on the thuggery.

There's no question they're losing it.
The only question how much pain they will cause, how many lives they will destroy, how many crimes they will commit before it's over.

Coincidentally, these are the same questions we asked about Iraq during the Bad Old Day of Bush & Cheney, and that we asked about Vietnam during the the Johnson-Nixon years.

----------------

*Their behavior actually exonerates the American puppet, Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, the Shah of Iran we installed when Mohammed Mossadegh, the duly elected President put forth the insane, unheard-of idea that the Iranians actually had more of a right to their own oil than the British, and threatened to act on that idea.
Pahlavi's CIA-trained death-and-torture Gestapo, Savak, horrified the world with its monstrous cruelty.

Now it seems it wasn't only our guys in Iran who were monsters.

---------------------

** Other Lenny Bruce sites:

Lenny Bruce (1925-1966)- Leonard Alfred Schneider

Lenny Bruce on Answers.com

Lenny Bruce Quotes

Redux of Civil Union Posting from November 9, 2004

Of course, NOW it looks as if we have to include Democrats and President Obama among the sub-standard hypocrites what was the phrase Herman Hesse used about the Middle Class? Something to the effect of being "Afraid to commit themselves to salvation on Sundays and afraid to commit themselves to sin the rest of the week."
Something like that...

-- so everywhere it says "Republicans" or "GOP" or "Bush" please mentally add "Democrats" or "Dems" or "Obama" -- so much for profiles in courage.
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------

Tuesday, November 9, 2004 --
A Note to Red-state Bush Voters -- regarding "Civil Unions"

Civil Union.

Ahhh, the good Old White middle-class Chrrrristians --

Leadbelly said it just fine in Bourgeois Blues:



The Old Middle-Class:

"Lots of folks in this here town, call a man a nigger just to see him bow..."

The NEW, Improved Middle-Class:

"Lots of folks in this here town, call a man a faggot just to see him bow..."


It doesn't matter if it's 1964 and the Klannishistas are saying, "But it would destroy our traditions to let the nigrahs have all the privileges the white folk do..."

or 2004 and the children of those same assholes saying: "But it would destroy our traditions to let gayyyyy people have all the privileges the white folk... ahh, I mean the decent folk, do...."

---****

It's still petty, mean-spirited, terrified, chicken-shit viciousness and I can only hope, as in the metaphysics of some Christian orientations, that they find, at the last, that they've created a God just as mean and nasty and vicious as they are. Ahhh, no I don't -- that was a petty, mean-spirited thing to wish for.

People always come up with what they think is a good reason to crap on someone else.

I really liked Bill Clinton, still do, but quite frankly, he behaved like a craven piece of shit when he backed away from equal rights for gay persons, whether in the military or by refusing to stand up against the Defense of Marriage Act. There are some things worth the sacrificing of your presidency.

I watched his show-hearing on gays in military, and I remember a young sergeant testifying that it was "the same thing as integrating the Army."

To which some cornpone hypocrite like Jesse Helms gave him a hostile mushmouthed, "Why that's not so at all -- this is a sin according to the Bible, and no one ever said integration was a sin..."

The young sergeant was too young to remember, but I wasn't -- immediately to that senator's left was Strom Thurmond, and I yelled, "Oh no? That man sitting next to you said EXACTLY that-- that mixing races was a sin, when he opposed the Civil Rights Acts in 1957 and in 1960 and in 1964." Of course, years later, we discovered he did a bit more than just social mixing."

So get over it, you Christian hypocrites. Grow up. You have no problem bombing hell out of people of color around the world, but your big bad soldier boys are terrified some guy in the shower might pop a bone looking at them. Or are you more terrified that you might really want to direct your own willy toward that fellow in the shower.

I susbcribe to Herman Melville's position of religious tolerance, Moby Dick, Chapter 17:

"...I cherish the greatest respect towards everybody's religious obligations, never mind how comical, and could not find it in my heart to undervalue even a congregation of ants worshipping a toad-stool..."

But giving basic human respect to sincere fools is not the same as wanting to embrace their fantasies. You people don't seem to have any respect for those of us who have different spiritual fantasies, always acting as if we've never thought about such things, never read many books considered holy, including yours.

When we politely decline, you keep on and on, not accepting our own rights to our own spiritual beliefs, and when we finally lose temper and tell you to just fuck off, you whine and cry that we treat you with attitude and disrespect. (I'm no biblical scholar, but I don't recall Jesus whining and crying that Pontius Pilate was treating his beliefs with bad attitude and oh boo-hoo, disrespect?)

So keep it to yourselves, even as is instructed in that same Bible to practice it in your home and not in our faces, and certainly not when you use it as a club, as is ALSO tradition, to justify mean-spirited self-aggrandizing cruelty.

What you're saying when you so generously offer Civil Union is "We do not want to let faggots walk around like decent folk. We want them to have SOME stigma."

I am married to one wonderful woman, and we've been together some 30 years, and if two men or two women want to share their lives together and marry each other, it is not going to debase, diminish, or on any way degrade my own marriage.

I have absolutely no idea how anyone could possibly think it might do that to their marriage.

Maybe you're just terrified that, if it becomes acceptable, you'll be able to accept something about yourself you didn't want to know?

(Basic Freudian smart-ass aside -- look in the mirror.)

Recognize meanness when you see it.

You believe in a God of forgiveness, so forgive yourself for being such a shit and get over it.

Grow up.

---------------------

**** or 2009 -- "but marriage has ALWAYS been the union of a man and a woman .. through all time... what do you mean 'It hasn't?' " Well then we'll pass a law and SAY it is..."

2009 is the 25th anniversary of the year 1984 ...

The celebration has been ongoing for a long long time ... most recently, we find that the Iranian government still insists that their recent election was fine, the count accurate, and everything above-board -- despite admitting they'd found the vote total far exceeded the number of registered voters in 50 cities ...

("That's right, my friends, our beloved President UhmptyDumpty, proved he is a far greater man than was that dead dog of an interloper in Iraq, Saddam Hussein. Hussein boasted of getting more than 99% of the vote, but our beloved President Umptydumpty got a full 137% of the vote!!! Allahu Akbar!!")

And of course, we here in the good old USA had our illegally rigged election in the year 2000 (no, not that tired old observation of the nepotistic payoffs given to the justices Tippity-Top Court -- I am reluctant to call that bunch of co-conspirators 'Supreme" anything) -- I'm talking about the thousands of African-American voters in Florida denied access to the ballot box by Governor Jeb Bush's personal army, i.e., the Florida State Police.

And then 8 years of rewriting history ("Joe McCarthy was a good man and the Liberals slandered him ... Judge Bork wasn't crazy as a shithouse rat -- he was destroyed for political reasons*... continuing edited changes to the posted transcripts of Bush's speeches on the White House Web Site in response to any criticism in order to prove he never said what we all heard him say, and what was printed on that same web site just yesterday...and the like)

Orwellian

(Karl Roverer most certainly read and remembered 1984 the novel in which continual wars -- only the name of the enemy changes -- and the punishment of 'Thought Crimes' were social standards.

The repeated whack-a-mole pop-ups of Cheney and Bush and the rest of that Nova Mob** since then is more reminiscent of zombies or the Dracula story.

In fact, just like the Nova Mob, since Nova Express is the third novel in a trilogy that tells of a mob of aliens who travel from planet to planet increasing the vibratory level through fear and linguistic viruses until the planet explodes -- goes into nova ("So pack yer ermines, Mary, cause the whole shithouse is going up in chunks.") -- and they move on to destroy another one.)

Happy 1984 + 25
-------------------------------------------------

*POLITICAL? Like the First Amendment of the Constitution?
I recall Bork's job interview -- you know, the one Uncle Thomas called "a high-tech lynching," and how Bork railed against pornographic movies(Thomas, on the other hand, rather liked them) that "schoolchildren pass those theaters every day and see those photos" ... (never mind that the true 'refuge of scoundrels' is 'protecting the children') and when Bork was asked if it would be acceptable if the theater posted NO signs, titles, or anything else outside, that great constitutional liar continued to rail: "No, because even if they did that, the people who saw those movies would carry the poison back into the community." After which the magnificent and sorely-missed Barbara Jordan proceeded to give the man with the bad beard a tutorial on the Bill of Rights.

---------------------

**the Nova Mob -- From Nova Express by William S Burroughs -- an ancient, secret invasion of the earth by parasitic aliens who now control human minds and bodies ... drawn from science fiction and, because the aliens are described in terms of organized crime as the “Nova Mob”, from the hard-boiled detective novel.

I may not know the real truth of good or evil or just something else about abortion and reproductive choice -- but I know ONE THING --

There are a lot of people out there whose opinions I won't even listen to.
Especially those "patriots" who believe war is a good or necessary thing.

I have no uterus.

I may someday once again be involved in supporting the choice of someone who does have a uterus and a decision to make but will almost definitely NEVER be in the situation where I would be either totally COMMITTED to carrying a fetus full term or deciding I can NOT do it (in the sense of the old saw about breakfast of bacon and eggs -- the chicken is involved, but the pig is COMMITTED

But this I know -- I will NOT listen to ANY bullshit about it from ANYONE who believes it has been or will be acceptable to conduct a war -- optional, accidental, or whatever -- especially one in which non-combatants get wounded, maimed, killed, have their homes and families destroyed... those things that the self-satisfied killers who hire warriors to implement their economic or political call "COLLATERAL DAMAGE."

I already know your hypocrisy where LIFE is involved.

You have nothing to say to me.
You have lost your right to vote on the topic.
You may use disparaging words like "...on DEMAND," to imply that a woman's choice is some mere whim, but you only make yourself more obviously vile and despicable when you do.

The only one who has that right, to DEMAND, is the person who has that thing growing inside of her... she is the only one who has the right to decide whether "that thing" is a precious bit of growing protoplasm to be loved and nurtures and brought to fruition, or a vampire to be expunged.

HER CHOICE

Not mine, not yours, not that of any OTHER WOMAN but LEAST OF ALL those of you who would find it acceptable (even if unpleasant) to destroy other lives for wealth, power, even as response to an attack made on our security.

Perhaps, instead of terrorizing young women, you might look at aborted fetuses as COLLATERAL DAMAGE in what used to be known as "The War of the Sexes."

Dear Barack -

Regarding the Repuglican objections to everything (mostly without offering ANY credible alternative) --

We need the public option for health care

We need to let AG Holder investigate the war crimes committed by the previous administration

We need to overturn "Don't ask, don't smell"

We need to overturn the "Defense of Miscarriage Act."

You have the votes.

You really do NOT need to play the "Rather have 85% of what we want with 100% of the votes than 100% of what we want with 60% of the votes ---

Isn't it now unmistakably clear by now that the Republican agenda is what was always called SEDITION, i.e., continually undercut and chip away at the legal authority of the government...

AND GODDAMN IT -- THE VICIOUS PAID-OFF MOTHERFUCKERS ARE SUCCEEDING IN CREATING DOUBT WITHOUT CREATING ANY ALTERNATIVES. THEIR METHOD IS TO DESTABILIZE THE SOCIETY FOR THEIR OWN PERSONAL GAINS... just look at Cheney -- is there anyone who DOESN'T know Leon Panetta was right? -- that hapfen-mensch (and his cronies) have NO loyalty to anything but their confirmed belief that THEY have a right to OWN America and that anyone who believes the function of the state is the well-being of the public is a traitor.


The answer -- ram the bills through and let the Repubs scream their stingy asses off.

In other words: "Fuck 'em."

DO WHAT'S RIGHT AND LET THE CHIPS FALL WHERE THEY MAY.

Let them go on working out their mommy nightmares on Nancy Pelosi and wanking their tired willies on Sarah Palin...

FUCK 'EM -- Smile at them, ignore them, roll over them -- whatever

BUT PLEASE -- don't punk out on us now.

President Obama and DOMA -- the Defense of Motherfuckers Act

Something I'd like to believe about his allowance of and/or on insistence on pushing DOMA and also the Bush policy of "We can't tell you what we did because then we'd have to admit we got our rocks off by torturing people into telling us what we wanted to hear thereby letting us push away our( well-justified) lack of self-esteem so we could pretend we're such big tough guys ... when we have the upper hand)" and "Don't ask - don't tell."

I would like to believe, as a constitutional scholar, he's taking the path to prevent his advancements from being overturned the next time some rich corrupt idiot surrounded by evil hench-creatures gets to ride the big chair ---

During the Vietnam military insanity, about halfway through the draft years, the Selective Service people stopped denying C.O. classification to people who claimed they were Conscientious Objectors, even if they were NOT Quakers or Seventh Day Adventists. The policy was to just say "OK," and offer alternative service.

The decision was made at the highest levels of the D o J NOT to deny or prosecute sometime after the first man said "But I'm a Christian -- you know -- 'Thou shalt not kill?' -- Christians? Jews?"

The reason?

If it went to the supreme court and they held the very likely conclusion that C.O. Status should be available to anyone because of personal conscience, regardless of their religious affiliation, then that was that. The issue then was ALSO that a military draft was involuntary servitude.

So they kept it on the level of Selective Service Policy rather than constitutional law.

Conversely, I am hoping that by forcing these odious rulings to be taken all the way to the top, Obama and Holder are going for a decision to overturn those laws as unconstitutional without having to fight it out with idiots, assholes, and morons in congress.

(Same -- we can only hope -- that the evidence of war crimes ordered and/or committed by Cheney, Feith, Libby, Runsfeld, et al will force AG Holder, by order of International Treaty, to investigate and prosecute, all the while saying "Well, gee whiz, guys, we really wanted to let bygones be bygones, but the English and the Germans are saying 'No Jah, No.' ")

Well, it could happen.

It's not a great mystery, what's pissing off the Repugnants

Their money masters were all getting ready to rake in the chips the way they did when Poppy Bush played rear-guard for the Reaganites -- scooping up all the foreclosed properties that the flush players bought while they were happily raking it in during the Reagan ride and thought it was for real -- back then it was wine country ranches and Rolexes and high-performance cars that the pissant players gathered in during the rampant prosperity thinking it was going to continue and all the old vampires -- Bush and the rest -- knew it wouldn't and just waited to buy it all at bargain prices.

(Well how do you THINK they managed to get 90% of the wealth into 10% of the pockets?)

And here's Obama, trying to make sure that many if not most of the mortgage-ly screwed people will manage to ride this out and keep their homes -- and all the money people are howling as if their little money god had PROMISED these other people's properties to them and ANYONE who would DARE to help the little guys save their little stake was broadcasting heresy to the masses.

So they're furious.

Because they only have 90% and they want, as the old song went, "more, more more."

It's a disease and an addiction with those people and Obama may be the first President whose not an unmitigated enabler (even if he has to make some compromises just to stay alive -- politically and biologically, both).

Ultimately, the point of view doesn't matter as much to me as getting the idea the person knows what he or she is actually saying

In the instance of CIA Director Panetta saying that Dick Cheney's continual sedition SEEMS ALMOST AS IF he (Cheney) wants another attack on American soil to prove he's right...

Well, of course, we all know Mr Panetta is just telling us what we already know about that monster --

NO ONE has ever accused Dick Cheney of having loyalty to ANYTHING but his own advancement and enrichment and his cronies who are part of their plunderkraft ...

But of course everyone knows that no one is supposed to actually SAY THAT --

Hell, even the despicable John Wilmot, the 2d Earl of Rochester, a man who ranked right up there in despicability with Mr Cheney, said it 350 years ago:

"Any man who calls things by their rightful name will surely be hanged."

Is this a surprise? A man who has shaken down the US taxpayer for hundreds of billions of dollars for his pals, a man who insists that certain people must be tortured under his command, and not only did we put up with it then, but now we have to listen to him rave about how THAT WAS A GOOD THING.

Even Eichmann and Goebbels and Himmler didn't go so far as to try to convince us that it was a GOOD THING.

And they were also terrified sexually sick people who needed to know that there were people screaming in pain and terror because of their orders, something perhaps not true but something I tend to infer from his behavior.

But so what -- we've all INFERRED that about Mr Cheney all along -- just didn't want to acknowledge it because of the dilemma it would present to admit we know that about the man who was pulling the strings.

The point of this was hearing some Republican woman screaming at an MSNBC host about Leon Panetta for his comment (and he only said "it's ALMOST as if...") saying "He can't try to convince us he didn't infer that Mr Cheney really DID want us to be attacked..."

And I thought "Maybe he did -- but if you want me to give ANY credibility to anything you have to say, you'd have to actually know the difference between infer and imply.

Do you mean you KNOW that's what Mr Panetta actually THINKS (infers)?

Or that Mr Panetta said what he said in order to get US to believe that was actually Mr Cheney's motivation (implied)?

Whichever -- we all know in our hearts that if another major attack takes place, Mr Cheney will smile in satisfaction -- only a short step between that and wanting it to happen and then doing things to MAKE SURE it happens.

Cheney SEEMS to be a man who claims so much insight into the mental motivations of Al Quaeda as to once again bring up the thought the he actually WAS complicit in the 9-11 attacks.

After all, those 19 suicidal Saudi assholes made him and his friends IMMENSELY RICH.

OK, I figured I should at least TRY to watch Glenn Beck...

What I don't understand is how someone can be what appears to be certifiably insane and at the same time incredibly BORING.

I guess that takes some sort of special talent.

Rush Limbaugh thinks Von Brunn is a lefty? Well, maybe down in that bedbug universe of his, a white supremacist Nazi-symp IS .. compared to him

In the interest of free speech (and diagnostics of pathology) -- I'm guiding you to the land where bedbugs like James von Brunn lurk... where the holocaust never happened and where people like von Brunn point an accusing finger at the ghost of Adolf Hitler for NOT having gassed the Jews...

His book --


Kill the Best Gentiles!

may be found on this web site:


http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/6054

and -- amazingly -- the mission they state so proudly is this:

"We clearly see the evidence of the destruction to MAN and the earth that has been caused by ALL religions over the centuries and are therefore not supporters of religions, cults, sects or any group that demands conformity of thought, speech or action, or has rules, regulations or rituals that must be followed. Religions, nationalities and cultural "identities" are formed as a result of the brainwashing we receive from childhood. They are part of the tactics the Establishment uses to keep us all divided from one another and fighting one another. "

BUT WAIT! -- IT GOES ON...

"If we truly want peace on earth and freedom for all, we have to let go of all that which keeps us divided, and come together as MAN, conscious living co-creators of creation."


... and then, as you scroll down you get to THIS:

TOB SHEBBE
GOYIM HAROG!

KILL THE
BEST GENTILES!

A New Hard-Hitting Exposé Of
The JEW CONSPIRACY To
Destroy The White Gene-Pool
Talmud Sanhedrin


Because they want us all to come together as brothers and sisters without the brainwashing of"religions, nationalities, and cultural "identities..."

Truly a kumbaya reality...

A lot more interesting than politics... Things You didn't Know about orgasm... Mary Roach tells all, or at least, a lot

ALL the bedbugs are coming out...

We're sure seeing a lot of them these days -- and I think the late William Burroughs saw it for what it was back in 1968, writing about the Democratic Presidential Convention for Esquire, specifically the televised time when the police ran amok beating demonstrators, the event that was characterized as "a police riot," Burroughs said it this way:

“And what is the phantom fuzz screaming from Chicago to Berlin,from Mexico City to Paris?

‘We are REAL REAL REAL!!! as this NIGHTSTICK!’ as they feel, in their dim animal way, that reality is slipping away from them…

the police might be screaming ‘We are REAL REAL REAL,’ but it’s the desperate cry of a dying ghost”

---And so we see Rush Limbaugh and Newt Gingrich and Dick Cheney and the rest all blathering away on the media, trying not to acknowledge that it's over.

The time of the vicious white boys is past, and it seems to me they're terrified that the next wave might be as vicious as they were.

Holocaust deniers, racists, anti-Communists, et al -- this is what their lives were all about and now their worst fears are realized -- no one cares about the things that scare them, no one cares what they believe, no one is opposing them.

And here comes another bedbug creeping out from under the covers -- like Cheney and Rush and Newt -- just one more pathetic old fart trying to be relevant:

----------------

White supremacist James W Von Brunn opens fire at Holocaust museum

An 88-year-old white supremacist and Holocaust denier opened fire in Washington’s Holocaust Museum today, killing a security guard before being shot in the head.

James W von Brunn, who was convicted in 1983 for running towards the boardroom of Washington’s Federal Reserve building with a shotgun, entered the Holocaust Museum just before 1pm wearing a Confederate hat, and opened fire “indiscriminately” with a long rifle. Witnesses said that he had parked his red car directly outside, displaying a disabled badge...

...He is clearly a Holocaust denier ... Von Brunn bemoans that “Jews control all important sources of information”, and claims that there is a Jewish conspiracy to destroy the white gene pool. He also wrote: “America is a Third-World racial garbage-dump – stupid, ignorant, dead broke, and terminal. Whites LOVE their Enemies. Prepare to die, Whitey.” One of heroes he cites is World War II Real Admiral John Crommelin, a notorious anti-Semite who later ran for governor of Alabama.

In 1981, von Brunn entered the Federal Reserve in Washington with a shotgun to make a citizens arrest, he later said, to protest about high interest rates. He was sentenced to 11 years in jail.

On his website, he claims he was convicted by a “Negro jury, Jew /Negro attorneys, and sentenced to prison for eleven years by a Jew judge. A Jew/Negro/White Court of Appeals denied his appeal.”

***********************

Rev. Jeremiah Wright channels Mel Gibson

Wright: "Them Jews" won't let Obama talk to me

The Rev. Jeremiah Wright, President Obama's former pastor, has gotten himself back in the news again, this time by commenting on his post-election relationship with Obama...

... though he says he bears no grudge towards the president... Wright is clearly not happy about the fact that he's unable to speak with him... Wright told the paper:

Them Jews aren't going to let him talk to me. I told my baby daughter, that he'll talk to me in five years when he's a lame duck, or in eight years when he's out of office ...

They will not let him to talk to somebody who calls a spade what it is ... I said from the beginning: He's a politician; I'm a pastor. He's got to do what politicians do.

*********************

As I've said before, regarding Dick Cheney -- it's sedition. (AND, it's the LAW, the one he helped write):

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 allows the government to seize and control the communication media. Additionally, the USA Patriot Act contains a Sedition Clause which prohibits anti-government speech while the nation is at war.



Never can find a federal marshal when you need one, eh?